Wednesday, 19 September 2012
Constant Reader ...
Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
It is the end of term three in my course, and I have — by necessity — been drawn to complete many, many items of assessment.
Verily, pity my teachers. Yesterday afternoon, I submitted the pieces for my 'Novel' subject. Total: 14,000 words. Egad. Today, I submitted the pieces for my 'Symbolism, Poetry and Myth' (together at last, I hear you say?) subject. Total: 10,000 words. Yikes.
Needless to say, I have also organised delivery of vast quantities of caffeine for my teachers; the lovely Louise, and the virtuous Carole. Ladies: God bless you, and all those who sail in you.
Oh, and I have a cold. Which my partner gave me. Rest assured, I have dispatched the fly monkeys to his current location. They don't wish him any specific harm. But they'll probably mess up his hair. Which he'll hate. He spends quite a little bit of time on it, you see. It is all part of my evil plan. Heh heh heh. But I'll make it up to him. I have a lovely first anniversary gift for him this week. I'm a very, very good boyfriend, doncha know. ; )
Aaron Hughes will return in the short story: 'It's My Birthday and I'll Die (of Embarrassment) if I Want To'.
Friday, 14 September 2012
Coming soon: The Addams Family
'Da da da da' <click> <click>, 'da da da da' <click click> ...
Look who's coming
to dinner ...
'The Addams
Family' musical ran for nearly two years on Broadway, from 2010–2011. With a
current tour across North America, and another one proposed, it's pleasing to
see Australia beat London to the punch for the next major production.
(Surprisingly, there's also a Brazillian production currently running.) The
Australian staging — which may incorporate revised elements brought into the
show during its American tour — opens in Sydney, March 2013.
It's nice to see
another show having its out of town try-out in in NSW. But we all know that the
heart of musical theatre in Australia is Melbourne, don't we, people?
'The Addams
Family' is another in a line of family-friendly shows that are doing brisk
business around the world. Based upon the cartoons of artist Charles Addams,
and made famous in the 1960s TV series of the same name, the Addams family has
also featured in a series of movies over the last decade. This stage production, however, features an all-new
story, and some additional new characters.
The book is by
Oscar-winning Marshall Brickman and Rick Elice of the musical 'Jersey Boys'
fame. Music and lyrics are by Broadway wunderkind, Andrew Lippa, who is most
well-known for his scores of 'The Wild Party' and 'You're a Good Man, Charlie
Brown'. I've not listened to the cast recording of this show in depth, but it
does have some lovely tunes. (Memo to self: Catch up backlog of Broadway and
West End cast recordings. Yikes.)
The Australian
cast of 'The Addams Family' was presented to the media for the first time just
last month. This production will be headlined by John Waters and Chloë
Dallimore; respectively, as the debonair Gomez Addams, and the frostily
beautiful Morticia Addams. A legend of Australian television, film and stage,
Waters will no doubt lend his gravitas to this production. High-kicking
Dallimore is well-known to Melbourne audiences from her turn as the sultry
'Ula' in 'The Producers', and more recently as 'Lily St Regis', one of the
villains in 'Annie'.
Melbourne
performers Ben Hudson and Teagan Wouters respectively appear as the towering
'Lurch' and the Addams' daughter, 'Wednesday'. Indeed, the plot revolves around
Wednesday's love for a 'normal' boy and the ensuing shenanigans and badly-kept
secrets, followed by a dinner party involving both families. With echoes of the
plot of 'La Cage Aux Folles', this should provide fodder for many hilarious
moments.
I'm very much
looking forward to see how they manage to animate the disembodied hand
character, 'Thing', for this production. 'The Addams Family' musical looks like
it will be a hoot; think 'Thriller' meets 'The Birdcage'.
Wednesday, 12 September 2012
Reading # 2
Back in August, I wrote a short post about reading what you enjoy. Click on the following link to quickly read it. Don't worry, I'll be here when you get back. ; ) 'Reading'.
I don't subscribe to elitism around reading. Ignore the haters. Don't give them the time of day. If someone hassles you on the bus, train or tram (or ferry, for my Brisbane correspondents! Hello!) for reading that Danielle Steel romance, or that James Patterson thriller, try the following.
- Mark your place in your book. They've already hassled you, so don't let them allow you to lose your page.
- Smile sweetly. This will disarm them.
- Reply along the lines of: 'Well, you know, at least I'm reading. So many people never read, don't you find? It's so sad, and terrible for literacy levels. I'm really enjoying escaping into this book. It's well-written and plotted. This is the [insert impressive-sounding number – no-one will mind if you fudge it] book I've read this year.'
- Then, if the mood takes you:
- 'What are you reading?'
- This will force them to defend their own reading. You can then choose to look down your nose at their choice of reading matter. But I hope you'll be encouraging of their reading. : ) And you might just make a friend.
Oh, and just for the record, Danielle Steel is the fourth best-selling writer of all time, having sold a lazy 800 million books. And James Patterson holds a 'Guinness World Record' for the most bestselling hardcover fiction titles by a single author; a total of 63. That's hardcover, by the way, not paperback. Surely this means that they are producing interesting, intriguing and well-written books?
Read what you want, I say. More power to you. And never, ever apologise for what you're reading.
I am revelling in reading one of my favourite authors at the moment, Dean Koontz. Not counting several textbooks, which I'm still working my way through, I've finished reading my novels for college for the year. So, I'm catching up on some of Dean's recent titles. Actually, I feel quite smug. In the same way that I did an assignment on Stephen King last semester, I'm doing an assignment on Dean for college. So I get to read an author I love, then speak and write about him. Better still, I then get to use some of his themes in my creative writing for a piece to submit as part of the project.
Oh, and my man Dean? He's the world's sixth most highly paid author. I'm sorry, but you don't get to the top without having at least some skill as a writer. Take that, haters!
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
Coming soon — Ghost: The Musical
Another musical coming in 2013.
Ghost: The Musical
Following its current season in London's West End, and recent season on Broadway, 'Ghost' has been announced to come to Melbourne in August 2013. This stage production is, of course, based on the 1990 super-weepie film, starring the late Patrick Swayze, Demi Moore (when she still looked like Demi Moore) and the redoubtable Whoopi Goldberg. Apparently, like most big musicals of the last decade, it has dazzling special effects to spare. These will no doubt be used to good effect for the supernatural activities of the lead male character, 'Sam'.
'Ghost' features songs and lyrics by well-respected English muso, Dave Stewart. For those of you who grew up in the 80s and 90's, you would be familiar with his extensive body of work in the 'Eurythmics' with the charismatic Annie Lennox. The other creative forces on this show include legendary songwriter and musical producer, Glen Ballard, and Bruce Joel Rubin, who has adapted the screenplay which won him an Oscar. (The other Oscar for the film went to Whoopi for 'Best Supporting Actress', for her memorable turn as a psychic.)
I haven't given the London cast recording a thorough listening yet (my bad, people; I know, my bad) so I can't yet recommend any songs from this show. I've heard snippets from the score, though, and it is indeed promising. The über-ballad 'Unchained Melody' — the revived 'The Righteous Brothers' hit from the movie, featured to great effect during the notoriously romantic 'clay' scene — has been interpolated into the new score, so there's your hook song straight up.
Sadly, 'Ghost' has recently posted October closing notices for its London production. The New York production, despite being nominated for three Tony awards earlier in the year, closed scant weeks ago. The West End version will have run for a respectable sixteen months, with the apparently re-tooled Broadway production barely managing a five-month run. That said, the show is touted for a North American national tour in the new year, so it looks like this show may yet have some longevity to it. No definite word, though, as to whether the forthcoming Australian production will be affected by the shuttering of the original and American remounts, although rumours of deferment persist.
According to chatter on the boards, a number of non-English speaking productions of 'Ghost' are also planned worldwide. I would think that, amongst a number of other locales being bandied about, Germany would be ripe for the picking there. For those who aren't aware, many of the larger British and American musicals have enjoyed great success in translation there over the last decade.
Stayed tuned for casting details for 'Ghost'. Hopefully, we'll have an even balance of some new theatrical blood and some industry stalwarts. And I'm suggesting that we should all bring some tissues to this production. Actually, you may want those tissues handy now. The show to succeed 'Ghost' in its current London theatre is a new musical helmed by the talented Jennifer Saunders of 'French and Saunders': a 'Spice Girls' musical called 'Viva Forever' ...
Monday, 10 September 2012
I will follow him!
A big shout out of
'thanks! to all of you who have recently started following my blog! And
'thanks!' to those who have been with me from the beginning when I started here
earlier this year! I really appreciate all of your support.
For those of you
who are still considering follow my blog, here's a very short video that shows
you how.
You may need to
create a Google log-in to follow me — if you don't have one of the main email
addresses they suggest — but it's really easy and a quick process. You'll also
find the Google log-in helpful for myriad other sites and applications, given
how numerous Google's products are.
I'm up to
twenty-three followers! Whoo and hoo! This might be a drop in the ocean for the
bigger blogs, but for me it's huge!
This whole blogging
'thang' is a learning curve, but I'm really enjoying it. I hope you have a
chuckle here and there and find out one or two interesting things along the
way.
Thanks!
Sunday, 9 September 2012
Short stories
Okay, fair warning, people: I'm going to start uploading some of my short stories to this blog in coming weeks!
I've written more than a dozen short stories this year. They range from around eight hundred words, though to some whoppers at several thousand words. There's even one that clocks in at over five thousand words. Whoa. My teacher cried a little when I submitted that one.
The stories are spread across a range of genres, from humorous to sci-fi to vampire to gay to thriller: you name it. There's even romance. I'm hoping that there's something for everyone. I've had a ball trying out new themes and styles and ideas. I've really been flexing my creative muscles. It's been bringing me a lot of joy.
I've even been editing some stories up and submitting them to anthologies and competitions. I had two stories accepted for our printed NMIT course anthology, INfusion 46. We're looking at putting that up on the web as an ebook. Stay tuned. And I've got two stories accepted for our next course anthology, INfusion 47. That's due out in coming months. Again, we're looking to put that up on the web as an ebook in addition to the printed version. I'll let you know when I have a link for it.
I also had had a story accepted for the 'Time To Write' anthology to celebrate the one hundredth anniversary of the founding of NMIT. It was run the Bachelor of Writing and Publishing course at the NMIT Fairfield campus. I even got an 'Honourable Mention'. Don't worry: I won't start thinking I'm people. I've included the link to 'Time To Write', below, if you'd like to read my story.
I've got half a dozen other stories under submission for various online and printed anthologies, too. Fingers crossed that some of them get legs and get published!
Saturday, 8 September 2012
Horror
It's great to kill people ... in fiction.
For my Novel subject this year, I'm writing a young adult book. The subject? Why, zombies, of course! But this is an Australian take on zombie lore. And my story is set on the number 112 tram in Melbourne.
Chapter one. Late one rainy Monday evening, Ash and his friend, Dunc, are coming home from school after staying back to study. The tram they're on is involved in a bingle with a car. Then out of the darkness comes — you guessed it — a zombie, who attacks a driver. They fend off the walking dead and the tram sets off. As they leave, the streetlights start going out.
Chapter two. They are travelling on the tram, on their way to the terminus in Preston. A zombie attacks the passengers. Two of them die. They resume their journey, and all of the lights in the surrounding area go out.
Chapter three, part one. The tram arrives at the ambulance station near the end of the line, but there's no-one there to help them. They continue on to the terminus, where Ash and Dunk disembark to go to Ash's house. The boys are menaced by a zombie but manage to make it to Ash's place.
I had to break the third chapter as it this point as it was starting to get really long. That, and I ran out of time to complete the rest of it for class. Did I mention that it's also waaaay over the word limit? We need to complete around 8,000 words of the novel this year. I'm currently sitting at 15,000, and I still have to produce a piece for next term to workshop. Yikes. Oh well, better to have too much than too little, I say.
So, that's where I'm up to with my novel project. The rest of the chapter — and indeed the whole novel — is completely plotted out and ready to be written. This was one of the assessments for the class, to help us understand where our story is going. It's been great to me to have that structure to work with. It also gave me a much better understanding of my characters. Now, all I need to do it continue writing!
Producing a chapter each term is in itself a bit daunting. As I've mentioned, setting out to write a novel requires planning, plotting and a goodly amount of dedication to the work. This was all entirely new to me. We then take the chapter to class, where the group workshops it. It was a bit nerve-racking for me at first. I mean, I've had feedback on my business writing in my working life, but creative writing is a whole different kettle of fish.
I think it could become really possessive of your work, even defensive. I'm lucky, though, that I have a great group of fellow students, who are encouraging and supportive. They praise what works and suggest changes to what doesn't. After workshopping, we take in the suggested changes, and we submit the piece for assessment each term.
Our teacher, Louise Le Nay, is fantastic. She is helpful and patient and an endless source of knowledge on writing. It's no surprise that our Novel class is widely considered to be the favourite subject in our course. Louise is a novelist herself, having had The Hero published by Allen and Unwin in 1996. Unfortunately, it's currently out of print, but we've suggested to her to reissue it as an ebook. Stay tuned.
Louise is also something of a legend in Australian television, having appeared in the original cast of Prisoner. She then went on to be a script writer and editor for numerous Australian TV shows. Her experience has been invaluable to us in the course. Many of us have a cinematic eye when it comes to writing, and Louise's in sharply honed.
Next term will see me continuing writing the rest of chapter three of my novel. Who knows: maybe it will even get legs? Maybe I'll finish it, then edit the hell out it, and try for a publisher. Watch this space ...
Friday, 7 September 2012
Exam
My first college exam next week.
Yikes.
Up until now, all of our assessment has involved writing, research, classwork, workshopping, team projects, excursions, and oral presentations. This exam is for my Editing subject. Apparently, there will be lots of questions on grammar, punctuation, terminology and editing marks. I'm preparing for some serious cramming this week!
And then there's all of the written assessment for term one to hand in over the next two weeks ...
Oh well: sleep is for chumps. ; )
Thursday, 6 September 2012
Win
It's always nice to see someone you know have a win. Particularly if they're both a local and a writer.
The indefatigable Edwina Preston — biographer, editor, rock-star, reformed poetess, earth mother, muse, and now novelist — who also happens to be one of my wonderful teachers at college, has had her first novel published. We got to lay our hands tonight on copies of The Inheritance of Ivorie Hammer at the novel's launch at Wesleyanne in her home stomping ground of Northcote.
We heard from Edwina's publisher at Queensland University Press, John Hunter, who talked about Edwina's ten-year-long odyssey to complete, shop-around and finally bring the book to market. The lady of the moment gave a speech and read a wonderfully evocative selection from the novel. The excellent people at Readings sold copies of the book during the evening, which was going gangbusters. And music by 'The Frightening Lights' entertained the crowd while the author signed copies of her book.
You might already be aware of Edwina's writing from her biography of the late Australian artist, Howard Arkley. The book — Not Just a Suburban Boy — is a fascinating insight into Arkley's life, as the well as the Melbourne art scene of the 80s and 90s. Unfortunately, it's currently out of print, but Edwina's looking into having it re-published as an ebook. Stay tuned.
I'll be devouring Edwina's novel in the near future and posting a review of it here. Naturally, I'll be pulling no punches. I mean, just because she's my teacher, and that she will be grading me on this blog at the end of the year, does not mean that I am unable to remain impartial. Freedom of the press and all of that, doncha know.
Did I mention that she's a very attractive, youthful-looking woman; well-dressed, refined, and with a figure that just won't quit? ; )
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
50 Shades of Adobe
Oh, Adobe Creative Suite 5.5, your daughters are harsh mistresses. I thought I liked guys, but your vixens have made me cross the rainbow.
I meet Photoshop. I'm told she's a nice girl. I take her out to dinner. We look at pictures together. She's upfront and lets me play with her lasso tools. Her magic wand opens up a new world to me. We keep it low-key, but we do quite a little bit of red eye removal and cropping together. Although we don't really know each other that well, we seem to be having a good time. I start to get attached to her. I even do an evening course to make sure I can fulfill her needs.
But then she says we should start seeing other people. I'm a bit cut by this, but I move on. By chance, I happen to score an introduction to her — I'm told — hotter, younger sister, InDesign. We have coffee. Straight away I see her much larger selection of tools. She tells me she's close to her sister, and I believe it. We start working on documents. I like her hot layers. I really like her effects. Again, I do an evening course to make sure I can give her the best treatment a guy can. We even double date with a friend of mine and InDesign's cute cousin, Illustrator. We're liberated like that.
But then she says that she's not ready for commitment. I'm in the wilderness again. A couple of months later, I do another course to learn more about your family, Mistress Adobe. I like to be thorough. And you've got a lot of daughters. And those girls get around, if you know what I mean.
I'm intrigued by this one named Dreamweaver. As fate would have it, I bump into Photoshop, InDesign and Illustrator one day. They're out with their aunt, Dreamweaver. Man, she's a cougar. She slips me her card. We catch up. We start to see a lot of each other. She's an enigma, wrapped up in a conundrum, inside a paradox. She shows me both sides of herself; her design on top, and her underlying code. Hot.
I'm entranced now, in a dreamlike state. I need to get to know her properties box more intimately. Her CSS styles look hypnotic. Her assets ... man, does she have some. She wants me to design her some pretty pages. I'm thinking of doing another course to help me be a better partner to her. Because she can be tough as nails. She's so complex; deep. I'm the Neo to her Matrix. But I will get to know her better. Even if it kills me.
Yes, Adobe, your gals are certainly pieces of work. You saucy minxes, you. Rowr.
Tuesday, 4 September 2012
Collaboration
Two heads are better than one.
We have a project for college, where we need to produce a piece of fiction for other students to edit. In turn, we will edit their work. The twist is that we are working in groups producing this work. The kink is that is has to be a sci-fi piece set in a dystopian future. Challenging.
I had my group with two other (great) people. In session one, we brainstormed a slew of ideas, which I captured for us and sent on to them. In session two, the others weren't able to make it to class, so I took the liberty of fleshing out the material, which I sent on again.
I'm trying not to take it personally that both of my group members left the course, gaining mid-year acceptances into university courses. ; )
'So,' I thought, 'I'll write up a piece of text and submit that. With my now-apparent verbosity, it shouldn't be a challenge to get to the 5k word limit.' But I forgot that part of the point of this assessment is that it's a group project. Yikes. One of the reasons I wasn't tying a noose about having to write the piece on my own is because I work better on my own. Sure, I've collaborated on business writing with others. But never on creative writing. Somehow, I'd decided that this wasn't something that would work for me.
Enter the my superb future writing partner. She was in another, larger group. She heard of my dilemma. Nobly — some would say, foolishly — she agreed to jump ship and join my 'Nigel-No-Friends' pas de un.
We went through all of the notes. We talked it through. We emailed. I went away and produced a mammoth slab of text. After I revived her with smelling salts, she reviewed and edited the text and made wise cuts. She then went away and wrote more material. I said it looked great, and just today I get her full, FANTASTIC section to add to mine. Whoo and hoo!
So, I've now edited — perhaps I've even over-edited, as I'm still new to this — her fabulous text. I've combined it with mine. You don't want to know what the word count is. It's somewhere north of 5k. Somewhere far north.
The next step is to refine our combined text. Cuts will need to be made. Most of them will be in my section. Then we'll review it again. The litmus test will be sitting down over coffee and cake to read it aloud. I've found this year that this shows up all the little imperfections in a piece. We'll finally tweak it, and hey presto! we should have 'War and Peace' for another group of our fellow students to edit. So, despite my inherent control freakiness, it looks like I am indeed able to collaborate when it comes to creative writing. Better still, I've actually enjoyed the process. Amongst other things, it's taught me how to trust a fellow writer.
As for the word limit, I'm including a bottle of Valium when I submit the piece to my teacher.
Monday, 3 September 2012
Write it out
How good is writing?
In the words of the latest Pink song, 'Blow Me (One Last Kiss)': 'I had a sh*t day.'
But I fixed that right up by sitting down to write a story for college. We had to write a symbolic piece. That is, one where you layer the symbolism into and onto the story. I'm always joking about Freudian imagery in film – sometimes a tunnel is just a tunnel, and sometimes a rocket in just a rocket – so I thought I would add some sexual imagery to my story.
Well, didn't I go to town.
It's not '50 Shades of Grey' (thank God) but I had a fun time writing it. And I managed to keep it under 1,500 words. Yes, yes, it was only supposed to be 500 words, but as I've said this year: I can't even clear my throat in under 500 words.
And I feel sooooo much better for sitting down and writing myself happy again. I heartily encourage it.
It reminds that my Mum and my Nana used to tell my Dad, when he was down or annoyed, to 'Go and play a tune on the goanna, Don'. Dad would apparently sit down to the piano and start pounding away on the keys, playing and singing songs. Not long after, he would get up, perspiration dripping from his brow, but feeling much better. There's a lot to be said for the catharsis you get from having a go at being creative.
Sunday, 2 September 2012
Reviews
I've had several comments from visitors to my blog in recent weeks about my 'generous' reviews of theatre that they — in some ways, often quite rightly — think was dreck.
I see quite a bit of theatre. In line with the last couple of years, thirty to forty shows annually. This year, while I'm a student and not working, that number will probably be around thirty. During much of the mid-2000s, though, that number was often fifty or more per year. That's quite a bit of theatre.
So, I have a lot of productions to compare. I have to say that, over the course of the year, there will probably only be a handful of top-shelf shows that I'll attend. The rest will often range from fun to okay through to 'oh dear'. Yet, more often than not, I find things to engage me and which I can praise, in even the most average of shows.
My reviews on this blog are generally for people who don't see a lot of theatre. So, I try to give a frame of reference for the show, a bit of history about it, and I talk about what I enjoyed in it and what worked. If I thought it wasn't great, I'll also talk about that, and what I think could have been done to improve the quality of the show.
For me, I don't think there's much point panning a show just because it didn't work for me. This is based on my experience attending a large number of shows with an extended group of friends who also see a lot of theatre. Often, our opinions are vastly different on a show. I will come out thinking 'meh'; they will come out thinking 'wow'. I will rave about a person's performance; they will think it was uninspired. It's a truly subjective thing
Much like reading books or seeing films, what appeals to one person will not appeal to others. I don't much like ballet or opera. I understand the discipline and I appreciate the aesthetic of the forms, but I won't voluntarily see these sorts of performances. Yet I have friends whose theatre year is often full of interpretive dance and Wagner.
Also, Melbourne — and indeed the web — is a small place. I really don't want or need to aggravate people by posting angsty reviews of shows. Indeed, too often I've see write-ups of shows that are quite bitchy, or where the reviewer has an ex to grind. More power to them, but that's not my 'thang'. People have strong opinions about their passions, and rightly so. You have only to look at an excellent site like TheatrePeople.com.au, where reader responses to critical reviews can often be scathing.
That's not to say that there isn't a great time to be had at truly bad shows. Honestly, I've seen some very pedestrian shows that have been good to laugh at afterwards. More often than not, though, there's been some wheat amongst the chaff. Some shows may have become legendary for being ordinary. At the end of the day, you need to be able to compare and contrast theatre to get a good sense of what's good and what's not.
It's like 'Spiderman: Turn Off The Dark'. This New York show is doing huge business. Yet virtually everyone I've talked to who's seen it says that it's dreadful. But it's packing them in, so a lot of theatre-going people out there are obviously enjoying it. Go figure. It's like 'Fifty Shade of Grey' or most Adam Sandler films; people are enjoying them and they're doing great business, but they're not my cup of tea.
All of this said, perhaps my reviews are too kind. I can wear that. That might change in time. But for the near future, I'm all about encouraging people to go to theatre. There's so much good theatre out there in Melbourne to see. Yes, you'll see some average stuff, but it's same with anything: you take the good with the bad. To paraphrase Mary Sunshine in Chicago: there's a little bit of good in everything.
But not in 'Spiderman: Turn Off The Dark'.
Saturday, 1 September 2012
Musicals
You know, if I had a dollar for every time someone said to me, in response to my statement that I love musical theatre – 'Oh, I don't like musicals. They're really quite silly' – then I would have enough money to finally form a theatre company to perform, in repertory, my favourite shows 'Carrie' and 'Dance of the Vampires' ...
Everyone loves musicals: most people just don't know it. We've all been in, or been to, a musical more than once in our lives; you know you've tapped your toes and walked around the next day humming a tune from a show. We've all danced to 'The Time Warp', which is from the musical 'The Rocky Horror Show'. We all have classic songs that we love; many of them are from musicals. 'Send in the Clowns'? It's from Stephen Sondheim's musical, 'A Little Night Music'. We all love Hugh Jackman. How'd he get his start? In musicals. And everyone over the age of ten can sing a two consecutive lines from any song in My Fair Lady.
So, please don't go around saying you hate musicals. I mean, really. I put up with your conversations about football, babies and public transport: they're all loving and valid choices. Why aren't musicals?!
Friday, 31 August 2012
Reading
Whilst working my way through university I used to work in a book exchange and then in a bookstore. I saw all of these women – intelligent, articulate, often professionals – reading romances. I thought: 'Why?'. I saw all of these boys reading 'Commando' war comics. I thought: 'Why?'.
Then it occurred to me one day: they're reading something.
So many people read nothing, or very little, which I've never understood. How can you understand yourself and the world around you if you don't read? At the very least, I would think life would be so much more boring if you didn't read.
So, here's to everybody who reads something everyday: horror, bodice-rippers, fantasy, comic books, erotica, sci-fi, women's magazines, biographies, you name it. You're reading, improving your mind, and having a great time in the process.
As for me, I just finished 'Love and Summer' by Williams Trevor. It's a lovely, short book about young love in Ireland. One more novel to read for college and I then can get back to reading the fiction I love reading most: Dean Koontz, Stephen King, Dan Simmons, Anne Rice, Clive Barker, Whitley Strieber, Michael Crichton and more. Then there's the whole shelf of zombie novels ...
Thursday, 30 August 2012
Wednesday, 29 August 2012
Doppelgangers
I’ve had fun this
year incorporating some real-life occurrences into my writing, as well as some
real people from my life. I think the key to making this work is to keep the
most interesting and humourous elements of the various situations and to
embroider from there. And when it comes to including people you know, you need
to be very careful not to offend. Especially
if you’re painting someone in a less-than-flattering light, then you really need
to draw the character in such a way that they won’t be identified.
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
Characters
So far this year I’ve
read some great novels for college, with characters who have really come alive
for me.
‘Judge Holden’ in
Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian.
Absolutely the most harrowing book I’ve ever read, but an immensely rewarding
read. Truly, the Judge is The Devil incarnate.
‘Holden Caulfield’
in J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the
Rye. Such a wonderfully flawed character. This is one of the few classics that,
for me, really shows why it has such enduring popularity.
‘Stephen Wraysford’
in Sebastian Faulks’ Birdsong. A
marvellously nuanced character whose journey we follow from just before, and
through, World War 1.
‘Paddy Clarke’ in
Roddy Doyle’s Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha.
The child narrator of this novel irked me initially, but I soon came to love
him. A superb exercise in capturing a child’s voice.
‘Katniss Everdeen’
in Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games.
Quite simply, I adore this character. What Collins puts her through in this
novel, and its two sequels, is astounding. Katniss is a truly resilient protagonist,
and she feels so real to me.
And the really interesting
thing is that I wouldn’t have picked up any
of these books unless they had been prescribed for my course. I definitely think
that, as both a both a reader and a writer, I’ve been greatly enriched by
engaging with these characters and their journeys.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)